
Collab.ie Homepage
This week’s Tuesday Push is for Collab.ie, a site which aims to enable “collaboration by helping people with ideas meet people with skills”. Collab.ie is brought to us by SmartCube, the people behind SwiftStore.
So, how does it work?
Say you have a great idea but you don’t have the tech skills to implement it, you could come to Collab.ie and post an general outline of the project and ask for someone with the right skills to collaborate with you on it. Similarly, if you have a product but no idea how to market it, you could find someone here to help you get on track.
Now, at first this just sounds like another job / CV site, but (and I’m guessing here) there are other ways to collaborate other than just being paid straightforward salaries. Some people will no doubt offer advice for free. Others may even lend a hand on a small part of a project in their spare time. Others still might want a stake in the final company or product in return. I guess this whole aspect won’t become clear until more people are using the service.
Something that does stick out to me though is that a lot of the collaboration seems to take place behind closed doors. This makes sense for privacy reasons obviously, but also discourages people from joining in to collaborate. For instance, I wouldn’t spend my time on a message board giving advice to someone about SEO or SEM if someone else has already given them the same advice earlier in the thread. If the public’s responses to a Collab.ie posting are hidden from each other, they might be less inclined to take part in the first place. This is a little bit catch-22, so I’m not sure what the answer here should be.
I decided to try using the site and came up against some behaviour that was a little unexpected. When I hit the “Add a Project” button, rather than being asked to put in the details of my project, I was asked to login, with the usual “forgot password” link. However, I wasn’t given the option to register on the same screen, other than the link in the top right hand corner. Ideally, I’d have liked to see a form where I could post my project and add my login or registration details in at the end.
Apart from that though, the site seems pretty clear and functional to me. The latest projects list and the tag cloud give you a couple of quick ways into the content. All the expected links (Twitter, RSS) and pages (How, About, Contact) are easy to find. Overall, Lee Munroe has done a nice job on the design.
Any tool that can help move people and their ideas forward is very welcome, especially in current climate. A free tool like Collab.ie even more so.
Hi,
Thanks for the review. The site is not really a message board as there is concept of a dialogue. You put up your project and people apply to it. These applications are not public.
It would be suited to a person starting up who needs skills and is prepared to give up equity to get them in.
Cheers
Gareth
Hi Gareth,
No problem, we’re always glad to take part in the Tuesday Push.
The reason I brought up the public / private issue was because when I heard the name at first I thought it would be more public than it is. I guess there are enough message boards or blogs or even Twitter for that though.
Just a quick thought – there are a million people with ideas, and I would guess far fewer with the skills to realise them properly. The people with the ideas will most likely find and use your site anyway, so it’s up to you to attract the people with the skills to visit and apply.
Maybe you need to be more open and aggressive in how you sell the benefits of your site to the people with the skills? Maybe something like “Invest Your Skills” or “Equity For Talent” as your byline?
Best of luck with the site anyway. Hopefully it helps get a few start ups off the ground!
Cheers,
Phil
Hi Phil,
Some good points there. Initailly we thought of a simple web site for people to meet – put up a project and people apply. No boards/blogs etc. Now we are getting into the part where we have to get the word out, this may prove to be hard for a simple site as this.
Maybe you right about being more explicit – we had thought of taking a softer approach and let people use it how they see fit, but it may be the case that we need to steer people in a direcion.
Thanks again!
Gareth